 |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|||||
These are errors found in the pdf version dated September 2006. They have been corected in the html pages, which we try to keep always up-to-date.
In Chapter 3, Section 3.7.2, the comment following Table 3.16 should read "... and 0.03 standard deviations more (for a total of 0.04) if she does not." The point here is that total effect for women who want no more children is 0.0129 + 0.0305 = 0.0434 (not 0.0305). [gr]
In Section 3.3.3 in the paragraph starting "From the estimated logit effect of 1.049 and its standard error we can calculate a 95% confidence interval with boundaries (0.111, 1.266)." The boundaries should be (0.831, 1.267). The exponentiated values quoted later (2.30, 3.55) are correct. [Thanks to J. Marcus.]
In Chapter 7 the coefficients for 6-12 months are missing from Table 7.3.
The Web version here is OK. [Thanks for J. Colgan.]
The errors listed below have been corrected in the pdf version dated September 2006. I am keeping the list here just in case you have printed an earlier version.
Thanks to Tom Piskula for a number of corrections (all the ones without attribution below) and to correspondent Kivanç Yüksel for a correction to Chapter 3.
Chapter 2
- p. 33 last line, To best should be The best
- p. 43 first paragraph, seven parameters but then 8 are listed
- p. 49 second paragraph of 2.9.1, Using Equation 2.9 should be Using Equation 2.7 I think
- p. 52 second centered equation on the page, you may want to make bold the second X(i)
Chapter 3
- p. 15 (line 4) The expected number of users should be 665.3 (not 634.5) [K.Yüksel].
- p. 25 The value for the Constant in the Net effect column should be -1.966 instead of -1.066, I believe.
- p. 36 very top line, One we should be Once we
- p. 36 first paragraph, first sentence, controlling for one of both should be or both
- p. 36 first paragraph of 3.6.4, second sentence after the first centered equation, 0, an ( should be and
Chapter 6
- p.3 first centered equation in the lower section of large parentheses, there is a comma leading the three dots, but not one following
- p. 24 MCullagh should be McCullagh I believe
Chapter 10
-Table 7.3. The age estimates are missing the values for age 6-12 months, although these are shown in the Stata logs. I have corrected the html [gr].